0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:11:34 EDT 2025
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.18/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z5sM0LFo2n/E---3.1_17437.p
0.18/0.49	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.18/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with pid 17518 completed with status 0
0.18/0.49	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall
0.18/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.49	# Search class: HHUNS-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
0.18/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.18/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# new_ho_10 with pid 17523 completed with status 0
0.18/0.49	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.18/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.49	# Search class: HHUNS-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
0.18/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.18/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.18/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.18/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.49	
0.18/0.49	# Proof found!
0.18/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, ab: $i).
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, a: $i).
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, b: $i).
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_26, type, cP: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_27, type, cPx: $i > $i > $o).
0.18/0.49	thf(decl_28, type, e: $i).
0.18/0.49	thf(cGRP_COMM, conjecture, (((cP @ b @ a @ ab)<=(cP @ a @ b @ ab))<=(((![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X4)&(cP @ X2 @ X3 @ X5))=>((cP @ X4 @ X3 @ X6)<=>(cPx @ X5 @ X6))))&![X3:$i]:((cP @ X3 @ X3 @ e)))&![X2:$i]:((cP @ X2 @ e @ X2)))&![X1:$i]:((cP @ e @ X1 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z5sM0LFo2n/E---3.1_17437.p', cGRP_COMM)).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i, X6:$i]:((((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X4)&(cP @ X2 @ X3 @ X5))=>((cP @ X4 @ X3 @ X6)<=>(cPx @ X5 @ X6))))&![X3:$i]:((cP @ X3 @ X3 @ e)))&![X2:$i]:((cP @ X2 @ e @ X2)))&![X1:$i]:((cP @ e @ X1 @ X1)))=>((cP @ a @ b @ ab)=>(cP @ b @ a @ ab)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cGRP_COMM])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i, X19:$i, X20:$i, X21:$i, X22:$i, X23:$i, X24:$i]:(((((((~(cP @ X19 @ X18 @ X21)|(cPx @ X20 @ X21)|(~(cP @ X16 @ X17 @ X19)|~(cP @ X17 @ X18 @ X20)))&(~(cPx @ X20 @ X21)|(cP @ X19 @ X18 @ X21)|(~(cP @ X16 @ X17 @ X19)|~(cP @ X17 @ X18 @ X20))))&(cP @ X22 @ X22 @ e))&(cP @ X23 @ e @ X23))&(cP @ e @ X24 @ X24))&((cP @ a @ b @ ab)&~(cP @ b @ a @ ab)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i, X6:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((cPx @ X4 @ X3)|~((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((cP @ X5 @ X6 @ X1))|~((cP @ X6 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cP @ e @ X1 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cPx @ X1 @ X2)|~((cP @ X3 @ e @ X4))|~((cP @ X4 @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cP @ X1 @ e @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X6:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((cP @ X3 @ X4 @ X2)|~((cPx @ X1 @ X2))|~((cP @ X5 @ X6 @ X3))|~((cP @ X6 @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cP @ X1 @ X1 @ e)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cPx @ X1 @ X2)|~((cP @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((cP @ X4 @ X2 @ X1))|~((cPx @ e @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cPx @ e @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_6])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((cP @ X4 @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((cPx @ X1 @ X2)|~((cP @ X3 @ e @ X2))|~((cP @ X4 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_6])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cP @ X1 @ e @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_6])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((cP @ X4 @ e @ X1))|~((cPx @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cPx @ X1 @ X2)|~((cP @ X3 @ X1 @ X4)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((cPx @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_14])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cPx @ X1 @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_4])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~((cP @ b @ a @ ab)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((cP @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])])).
0.18/0.49	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 7
0.18/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.18/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 13
0.18/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
0.18/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.18/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 45
0.18/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.18/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.18/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 44
0.18/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.18/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.18/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 33
0.18/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 101
0.18/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 90
0.18/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.18/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 101
0.18/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.18/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.18/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.18/0.49	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.18/0.49	# Total rewrite steps                  : 60
0.18/0.49	# ...of those cached                   : 22
0.18/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.18/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.18/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.18/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.18/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
0.18/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 101
0.18/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 42
0.18/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 57
0.18/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
0.18/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.18/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
0.18/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 66
0.18/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 30
0.18/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 45
0.18/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.18/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1837
0.18/0.49	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 227
0.18/0.49	
0.18/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.49	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.18/0.49	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.18/0.49	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.18/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
0.18/0.49	
0.18/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.49	# User time                : 0.008 s
0.18/0.49	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.18/0.49	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.18/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.18/0.49	% E exiting
0.18/0.49	% E exiting
0.18/0.49	EOF